The SprintProposal developmentPursuit memoryCaptureGraphicsGraduationCompareAboutResultsLearnDoPricingWorkbenchSecurityFAQBook a call →

vs. AI proposal tools

Every option is right for someone. These pages are here to help you find which one is yours — even when the answer isn't us.

AI proposal tool

Software that drafts fast — once you have a team and an operator to drive it, edit it, and keep it compliant.

×

The team and the engine in one. You don't operate software or supervise a draft — you get the finished proposal.

Side by side

AI proposal tool
Best when
You already have a proposal team to run it
You don't have a team and don't want to build one
What you get
Software that drafts fast, once someone drives it
The team and the engine — you get the finished proposal
Cost
~$30–40K/yr, plus the salary to operate it
Membership $6,000/mo + pursuit fees from $15,000 — the finished proposal, not a seat license
Who runs it
You and your staff
A named senior operator with agents
The risk
Build-your-own usually dies in implementation, for want of an operator
Supervised output; nothing ships unsupervised
Pick a tool if

you already employ a proposal team that wants to move faster.

Pick us if

you don't have that team and don't want to build one.

Keep your tool — add the human layer. If a tool already drafts for you, frwrd.review ($2,500/mo) is the senior human review over whatever it produces: every shall checked, an editorial pass, second eyes. The tool drafts; we catch what it misses; you own the fix. The 70% the tool can't do, on top of the 30% it can. See frwrd.review →
frwrd.team

Still the middle? That's us.

Tell us what you're bidding and we'll give you an honest first cut — even if the answer is one of the others.